<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higher-order Polymorphism for pseudo-Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tmorris.net/higher-order-polymorphism-for-pseudo-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/higher-order-polymorphism-for-pseudo-java/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Tony Morris</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Higher kinded types &#124; Dev Portal</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/higher-order-polymorphism-for-pseudo-java/#comment-91198</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher kinded types &#124; Dev Portal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/?p=642#comment-91198</guid>
		<description>[...] I thought it would be useful to see where we&#8217;re at to start with. Looking at Higher-order Polymorphism for pseudo-Java, the code there won&#8217;t compile. But here is the code translated into working Java code using [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I thought it would be useful to see where we&#8217;re at to start with. Looking at Higher-order Polymorphism for pseudo-Java, the code there won&#8217;t compile. But here is the code translated into working Java code using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Morris</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/higher-order-polymorphism-for-pseudo-java/#comment-36977</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/?p=642#comment-36977</guid>
		<description>Hello Alexander,
Unfortunately Java's type system is not practical enough to express this level of abstraction. This code is not real Java, but a pseudo-Java with an added type system feature (higher-order polymorphism).

The code can be made to work on the JVM using the Scala programming language (with syntax translations) or Haskell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Alexander,<br />
Unfortunately Java&#8217;s type system is not practical enough to express this level of abstraction. This code is not real Java, but a pseudo-Java with an added type system feature (higher-order polymorphism).</p>
<p>The code can be made to work on the JVM using the Scala programming language (with syntax translations) or Haskell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/higher-order-polymorphism-for-pseudo-java/#comment-36921</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/?p=642#comment-36921</guid>
		<description>Does this code have some practical value?

I'm getting the following error in the Functor interface: type 'F' does not have type parameters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this code have some practical value?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting the following error in the Functor interface: type &#8216;F&#8217; does not have type parameters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

