<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ignorance is mostly bliss, but not always</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Tony Morris</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: User</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>I agree with the last comment, it would be really great to have a comparison of Scala and CAL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the last comment, it would be really great to have a comparison of Scala and CAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yang</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 08:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Hey Tony, I (and I'm sure others) would be highly interested in seeing a direct comparison of Scala and CAL, in terms of language features/abstractions/principles, if you ever have the time. I am also currently in the same boat (experienced with Scala, new to CAL, and utterly torn).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tony, I (and I&#8217;m sure others) would be highly interested in seeing a direct comparison of Scala and CAL, in terms of language features/abstractions/principles, if you ever have the time. I am also currently in the same boat (experienced with Scala, new to CAL, and utterly torn).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-716</guid>
		<description>CAL is very nice, the amount of work that's gone into it shows. The videos of the Gem Cutter and Sapphire are probably worth watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CAL is very nice, the amount of work that&#8217;s gone into it shows. The videos of the Gem Cutter and Sapphire are probably worth watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Henning</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Henning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/ignorance-is-mostly-bliss-but-not-always/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>I guess if you want Haskell, CAL is better.

I'm done searching for new languages. I'm sticking with Scala.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you want Haskell, CAL is better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m done searching for new languages. I&#8217;m sticking with Scala.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
