<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linq has nothing to do with SQL or enumerable lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tmorris.net/linq-has-nothing-to-do-with-sql-or-enumerable-lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/linq-has-nothing-to-do-with-sql-or-enumerable-lists/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Tony Morris</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Morris</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/linq-has-nothing-to-do-with-sql-or-enumerable-lists/#comment-37589</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/?p=653#comment-37589</guid>
		<description>G'day Ricky,
That's a very good point and is probably a reason this misunderstanding seems disproportionate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day Ricky,<br />
That&#8217;s a very good point and is probably a reason this misunderstanding seems disproportionate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Clarkson</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/linq-has-nothing-to-do-with-sql-or-enumerable-lists/#comment-37587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Clarkson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/?p=653#comment-37587</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony..

LINQ has nothing to do with SQL or enumerable lists, but the .NET namespace System.Linq has everything to do with enumerable lists.  That's a good source of confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony..</p>
<p>LINQ has nothing to do with SQL or enumerable lists, but the .NET namespace System.Linq has everything to do with enumerable lists.  That&#8217;s a good source of confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

