<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The most ironic logical proposition on the internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Tony Morris</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Morris</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 03:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I am wrong, but I interpret that claim as Lisp being "simply the most powerful language available".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I am wrong, but I interpret that claim as Lisp being &#8220;simply the most powerful language available&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slava Pestov</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Slava Pestov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Does Graham say Lisp is powerful, or Lisp is the most powerful? Anyway don't read too deeply into Graham's ramblings, they're more entertainment than statements of fact. He regularly contradicts himself and says things which make no sense at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Graham say Lisp is powerful, or Lisp is the most powerful? Anyway don&#8217;t read too deeply into Graham&#8217;s ramblings, they&#8217;re more entertainment than statements of fact. He regularly contradicts himself and says things which make no sense at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lyons</title>
		<link>http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tmorris.net/the-most-ironic-logical-proposition-on-the-internet/#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Well, from the context about the power continuum, what he's saying is that the most weird programming language is the most powerful. This makes sense to some of us from the experiences of our lives: SNOBOL looked weirder than BASIC and was more powerful, Python weirder than that and was more powerful, and now learning OCaml, Haskell, Erlang, seeing that they seem weirder even than Lisp, which was pretty damn weird in its own right.

Of course it's a logical fallacy though, because there are also languages like INTERCAL and J, which clearly aren't more powerful but are definitely weird looking. And anyway, there are tens of thousands of programming languages out there; so many, it would be impossible to be abreast of all of them all the time. So you are right -- the assertion would only hold if Graham knew something about every language. Which of course he doesn't -- he's too happy with Lisp!

Thanks for taking PG to task on this. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from the context about the power continuum, what he&#8217;s saying is that the most weird programming language is the most powerful. This makes sense to some of us from the experiences of our lives: SNOBOL looked weirder than BASIC and was more powerful, Python weirder than that and was more powerful, and now learning OCaml, Haskell, Erlang, seeing that they seem weirder even than Lisp, which was pretty damn weird in its own right.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s a logical fallacy though, because there are also languages like INTERCAL and J, which clearly aren&#8217;t more powerful but are definitely weird looking. And anyway, there are tens of thousands of programming languages out there; so many, it would be impossible to be abreast of all of them all the time. So you are right &#8212; the assertion would only hold if Graham knew something about every language. Which of course he doesn&#8217;t &#8212; he&#8217;s too happy with Lisp!</p>
<p>Thanks for taking PG to task on this. <img src='http://blog.tmorris.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

